1) Vote NO on S164 which would permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. Undermines ESA! @SenBennetCO pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK
2) S164 de-fangs ESA, permanently delists wolves w/NO judicial review! Vote NO @KamalaHarris @SenFeinstein #Wolves pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz
3) S164 undercuts ESA. Delists wolves permanently, precludes judicial review. VOTE NO @SenDurbin @SenDuckworth pic.twitter.com/Fk4AYRIOI7
4) Wolves are NOT a bargaining chip! NO to any bill delisting them or undercutting ESA pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y @SenatorLeahy @sensanders
5) NO on S164 to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. Undermines ESA! @SenBillNelson #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK
6) If @amyklobuchar is a Democrat why is she working with GOP to undermine the Endangered Species? #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y
7) Save the ESA! NO on S164 to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. @SenGillibrand @SenSchumer pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK
8) SB164 undercuts ESA, permanently delists wolves w/NO judicial review! Vote NO @ChrisCoons @SenatorCarper #Wolves pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz
9) No bargain with wolves' lives! NO delisting, no precluding judicial review. #S164 @SenatorHassen @SenatorShaheen pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v
10) S164 threatens ESA. Delists wolves permanently, precludes judicial review. VOTE NO @SenBlumenthal @ChrisMurphyCT pic.twitter.com/Fk4AYRIOI7
11) S164 permanently delists wolves w/NO judicial review. Threatens ESA! Vote NO! @maziehirono @SenBrianSchatz pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz
12) Wolves are big tourism draw! Important keystone predators. Pls #SaveTheESA and #KeepWolvesListed! @jontester pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK
13) @amyklobuchar sides with GOP to sell out ESA! Has bill to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. pic.twitter.com/ew7plGcWGj
14) S164 permanently delists wolves w/NO judicial review. Threatens ESA! Vote NO @SenMarkey @SenWarren #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz
15) NO to any bill that delists wolves, precludes judicial review. Threatens ESA! @Peters4Michigan @SenBobCasey pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz
16) #SaveTheESA! NO to any leg that delists species, precludes judicial review. @SenSherrodBrown #S164 #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y
17) NO on S164 to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. Undermines ESA! @SenatorTester #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK
18) S164 undercuts ESA. Delists wolves permanently, precludes judicial review. VOTE NO @SenAngusKing @brianschatz pic.twitter.com/Fk4AYRIOI7
19) NO on S164! Threatens ESA by permanently delisting wolves, precluding judicial review. Dangerous! @SenGaryPeters pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v
20) S164 undercuts ESA. Delists wolves forever, prevents judicial review. VOTE NO @SenatorCardin @ChrisVanHollen pic.twitter.com/Fk4AYRIOI7
21) Wolves are NOT a bargaining chip! NO to any bill delisting them or undercutting ESA. pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y @timkaine @MarkWarner #S164
22) S164 undercuts ESA. Delists wolves forever, prevents judicial review. VOTE NO @McCaskillOffice @elizabethforma pic.twitter.com/Fk4AYRIOI7
23) Dem senator is selling out the Endangered Species Act with S164, partnering with GOP! Shame @SenatorBaldwin! pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v
24) NO on S164! Threatens ESA by permanently delisting wolves, precluding judicial review. Dangerous! @SenStabenow pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v
25) @SenatorBaldwin joins GOP to undermine ESA! Her bill would delist wolves permanently, preclude judicial review! pic.twitter.com/KD96GMBQvD
26) Wolves are NOT a bargaining chip! NO to any bill delisting them or undercutting ESA pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y @SenJackReed @SenWhitehouse
27) NO to any bill that delists wolves, precludes judicial review. Threatens ESA! @CatherineForNV @stabenow pic.twitter.com/Fk4AYRIOI7
28) NO on S164! Threatens ESA by permanently delisting wolves, precluding judicial review. Dangerous! @SenCortezMasto pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v
29) A species is not a bargaining chip! NO to any laws that undercuts ESA, delists wolves @SenSchumer! #SaveWolvesNow pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz
30) NO on #S164: delists wolves permanently, enjoins judicial review, undercuts ESA! @SenJeffMerkley @RonWyden pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y
31) Protect the ESA! NO on S164 which permanently delists wolves, precludes judicial review @clairecmc #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK
32) NO on #S164: delists wolves permanently, enjoins judicial review, undercuts ESA @martinheinrich @SenatorTomUdall pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y
33) NO on S164! Threatens ESA by permanently delisting wolves, precluding judicial review @SenatorHeitkamp @alfranken pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v
34) Save the ESA! NO on S164 to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. @SenDonnelly #KeepWolvesListed pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK
35) Do NOT bargain with wolves' lives! NO delisting, no precluding judicial review @corybooker @SenatorMenendez pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v
36) NO to any bill that delists wolves, precludes judicial review. S164 undercuts ESA! @SenatorCantwell @PattyMurray pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz
37) Wolves= big tourism draw, important keystone predators. #SaveTheESA. NO on #S164! @alfranken @Sen_JoeManchin pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK
Please join our Facebook Group to continue the environmental resistance!
All done and added "r/t" (re-tweet) where I could on each one. Thank you for doing this.
ReplyDelete~Candy Copeland, Marketing Director for National Wolfwatcher Coalition
Stay away from the wolves! Or I'll bite you on the BUTTOCKS!
ReplyDeleteLeave the Wolves Alone!!!! Stop the killing!!! Haunt the poachers instead. Wildlife should be protected!!!
ReplyDeleteStop killing these beautiful creatures all wildlife should be protected. Punish the hunters. Poachers and trappers instead. And leave the wildlife alone! This act was placed to protect and preserve them . Not harm them.
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing this,,Lets Speak loud!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePlease everyone go to senator Baldwin's, Tester's and other Democrats Facebook pages. Tell then I am a democrat. I contribute to the DNC. I helped elect you but make no mistake I will work to oust you in the next election by tweeting, face booking and not contributing. I will insist the DNC find a batter more wildlife friendly candidate. I will make my voice heard if you work to delist wolves. You work for me, not for special interests. In this time at this moment this is the most egregious, misdirected piece of anti environmental anti wildlife legislation either party could envision. Wolves face immediate slaughter once delisted under state plans that were rejected by scientists and the 9th circuit federal court. I might expect this from the GOP now but for democrats this is unconscionable as is the no judicial review clause.
ReplyDeleteHi all dear guy !
ReplyDeletenice information thanks for sharing
gclub casino
goldenslot casino
goldenslot
I love this cozy and personal post. And that bodysuit looks extra cozy!
ReplyDeleteThis act was placed to protect and preserve them . Not harm them.
gclub
gclub casino online
จีคลับ