Thursday, July 20, 2017

TWEET SHEET: Save Smackout Pack

1) Dont let Washington kill wolves for cows on federal land. Follow protocol! #SaveSmackout 🐺 @JayInslee @GovInslee pic.twitter.com/sNTubYRoxe

2) Dont let Washington state kill wolves for cows on federal land. Follow the protocol! #SaveSmackout 🐺 @WDFW pic.twitter.com/sNTubYRoxe


3) .@UWTLedger @GovInslee #SaveSmackoutPack Incomplete investigation does not support extermination. pic.twitter.com/esNTubYRoxe/


4) .@ballardnewstrib @GovInslee #SaveSmackoutPack Incomplete investigation does not support extermination. pic.twitter.com/sNTubYRoxe/



5) .@thedaily @WDFW #SaveSmackoutPack Incomplete investigation does not support extermination. pic.twitter.com/7mqAkKk5Yb


6) .@TheFrontOnline @GovInslee #SaveSmackoutPack Incomplete investigation doesn't support extermination. pic.twitter.com/7mqAkKk5Yb/


7) .@CWUObserver @GovInslee #SaveSmackoutPack Plz delay kills for complete investigation. pic.twitter.com/7mqAkKk5Yb/


8) .@EasternerOnline @JayInslee #SaveSmackoutPack Plz delay kills for complete investigation. pic.twitter.com/7mqAkKk5Yb/



9) .@SENewsteam @WDFW #SaveSmackoutPack Don't kill another wolf pack for cows. pic.twitter.com/1PUfEuraWJ


10) .@edmondsbeacon #SaveSmackoutPack Predation may have been hybrids. pic.twitter.com/1PUfEuraWJ


11) .@pnwlocalnews #SaveSmackoutPack Predation may have been hybrids. pic.twitter.com/1PUfEuraWJ


12) .@SenatorCantwell @KitsapSun #SaveSmackoutPack Predation may have been hybrids. pic.twitter.com/1PUfEuraWJ


13) .@PattyMurray @EverettHerald #SaveSmackoutPack Predation may have been hybrids. pic.twitter.com/1PUfEuraWJ


14) .@RepDelBene @The_CBH #SaveSmackoutPack Predation may have been hybrids. pic.twitter.com/1PUfEuraWJ


Monday, July 17, 2017

Protest Secretary Zinke at ALEC Conference


Our Secretary of the Interior, Ryan Zinke, will be addressing guests at ALEC's annual meeting this week. ALEC passed resolution over 20 years ago opposing national monuments and has been at the forefront of returning federal public lands to the states.

Secretary Zinke works for us and has received millions of public comments begging him to keep our public lands protected. Will he heed public opinion? Or fold to ALEC's lobbying that he "not hesitate to rein in the excesses of previous presidents and free states and local communities from under the federal boot." (ALEC.org).

Please let Secretary Zinke know what you think of this conflict of interest.

Millions of Americans have made public comments asking you to preserve our national monuments. It does not seem appropriate for you to attend ALEC's annual meeting this week when ALEC has been lobbying to reduce and abolish national monuments for 20 years. 

FACEBOOK PAGE: Leave the above comment or one of your own on an existing post HERE.

INTERIOR FEEDBACK FORM HERE.

TWEETS: 

This week, .@SecretaryZinke addressing ALEC, not public comments! ALEC pushed giveaway of #PublicLands for 20 yrs pic.twitter.com/XXqro67QUo

ALEC promoted reduction of national monuments for decades. This week, @SecretaryZinke speaking at annual meeting. pic.twitter.com/cDGfD9jqiM



Saturday, July 15, 2017

TWEET SHEET: Ask Committee for Environment & Public Works to Vote NO on S1514



The Senate Committee of Environment and Public Works will consider S1514 this Wednesday, July 19 at 10 am.  Make sure that the committee members know how you feel before the hearing. Please tweet all of the committee members below. IF YOUR SENATOR IS SITTING ON THIS COMMITTEE, please also call or email him or her to ask for a NO vote on S1514.

1) .@SenSanders Pls vote AGAINST S1514, which removes wolves from the ESA and PRECLUDES judicial review! Dangerous pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

2) I oppose S1514, which sets a dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review. @SenJohnBarrasso pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j #NoOnS1514

3) .@SenCardin S1514 threatens Endangered Species Act by precluding judicial review. Withdraw sponsorship NOW! pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

4) I oppose S1514, which sets a dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review. @JimInhofe pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j #NoOnS1514 #3branches

5) Vote NO on S1514, which sets a dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review. @SenCapito pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j #ChecksAndBalances

6) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review, harms wildlife. @SenKamalaHarris  pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

7) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review. @SenatorWicker #ChecksAndBalances pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

8) .@SenDuckworth Pls vote NO on S1514! It harms wildlife and rivers, undermines ESA by precluding judicial review. pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

9) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review. @JohnBoozman #ChecksAndBalances pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

10) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review and harms wildlife. @SenatorCarper pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

11) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review and harms wildlife @SenJeffMerkley pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

12) .@SenWhitehouse Pls vote NO on S1514! It harms wildlife and rivers, undermines ESA by precluding judicial review. pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

13) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review @SenShelby. #3BranchesOfGovt pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

14) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review @SenatorFischer. #3BranchesOfGovt pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

15) .@CoryBooker Pls vote NO on S1514! It harms wildlife and rivers, undermines ESA by precluding judicial review. pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

16) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review @JerryMoran. #ChecksAndBalances pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

17) .@SenMarkey Pls vote NO on S1514! It harms wildlife and rivers, undermines ESA by precluding judicial review. pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

18) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review @SenDanSullivan! #3BranchesOfGovt pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

19) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review @SenJoniErnst! #3BranchesOfGovt pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

20) Vote NO on S1514, which sets dangerous precedent of precluding judicial review @SenatorRounds! #3BranchesOfGovt pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j

21) .@SenGillibrand Pls vote NO on S1514! It harms wildlife and rivers, undermines ESA by precluding judicial review. pic.twitter.com/LUirwdXW3j




CALL TO ACTION: Public Comments for Our Marine Monuments & Sanctuaries



Our marine monuments and sanctuaries are at risk during Trump's executive order dictating a "review" of national monuments. If protections are reduced, these special places could be opened for energy and mineral exploration or commercial fishing. At risk are over 425 million acres of habitat for marine mammals and coral reefs and beaches. 

ELECTRONIC PUBLIC COMMENT:

DUE AUGUST 15 AT 11:59 PM EDT. Please prepare your comment in a document where you can save it. Once it is complete, submit your comment HERE and please also email it to your Senators (contact info HERE) and to your representative (contact info HERE).

WHAT TO SAY:

If you have visited any of the monuments or sanctuaries under review or have a connection to them, please address that particular monument. (HERE is a list of monuments under review). The Department of Commerce is looking for personal stories. 

* IF YOU LIVE IN ONE OF THE AFFECTED STATES - CALIFORNIA, HAWAII, OREGON OR WASHINGTON - OR IN MICHIGAN OR MASSACHUSETTS - PLEASE MENTION IT IN YOUR COMMENTS AND MAKE SOME CONNECTION TO VISITING THE MONUMENTS OR THE COAST. 

Please keep the 11 marine monuments and sanctuaries protected as they are today. Each of these sites are the result of decades of broad, bipartisan support expressed by our elected officials and the public. Each monument underwent a robust public process. Finally, the monuments demonstrably cause no harm to the economy, specifically the longline fishing industry. Please maintain these vital protections for the benefit of wildlife, people, and our entire region.

* National marine monuments and sanctuaries safeguard biodiversity by protecting ecosystems. In these sanctuaries, unique ocean life flourishes. These monuments are also important culturally and as part of our national heritage. Further, these monuments provide nursery and spawning habitats for commercially valuable fish while also protecting thousands of threatened species.  

* National Monument or sanctuary designation often increases - NOT decreases - jobs in areas surrounding the land at issue. While it is true that drilling, dumping and mining jobs may decrease, OVERALL jobs increase and the sectors of tourism in a huge boost to coastal economies.  For instance, 2015 NOAA report found that recreational fishing in California's marine sanctuaries supports more than 1,300 jobs, generating more than $200 million a year. Further, the Monterey Bay sanctuaries alone provide more than 35,000 jobs and a $3.5 billion dollar a year tourism economy. Despite the popular argument, national monument or sanctuary designation HELPS, and does not hurt, local economies. 

** SPECIFIC TALKING POINTS FOR EACH MONUMENTS OR SANCTUARY HERE. (These are VERY helpful for crafting individualized comments).

** SPECIFIC TALKING POINTS FOR PACIFIC MARINE MONUMENTS ARE HERE.

** TALKING POINTS FROM MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM HERE.



POSTCARDS (MAIL BY AUGUST 8):

You may submit comments via postcard or letter, identified by docket ID NOAA-NOS-2017-0066, to:
E.O. 13795 Review
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Silver Spring Metro Campus Building 4 (SSMC4), Eleventh Floor
1305 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910

* Please also send postcards to your Senators (addresses may be found HERE) and to your representative (addresses may be found HERE) asking them to fight to keep marine sanctuaries protected.

* If you have visited any of the monuments under review or have a connection to them, please address that particular monument. (HERE is a list of 11 marine monuments and sanctuaries under review). Department of Commerce is looking for personal stories.

* If you do not have a connection to one of the specific monuments involved, personalize the following:

I treasure our marine sanctuaries and monuments. I visit these special places whenever I have the chance to find peace and enjoy the beauty and wildlife.  I want them to remain protected as they are today. 




PETITIONS:

Monuments For All (Rose Atoll, Papahānaumokuākea, Pacific Remote Islands, Marianas Trench,  
            Northeast Canyons and Seamounts)
Care2 (Papahānaumokuākea)
Turtle Island Restoration Network
National Marine Sanctuary Foundation
Conservation International (Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument)
Audubon California (California marine monuments)
Pacific Environment (Pacific monuments)
Pacific Environment (Papahānaumokuākea)
Pacific Environment (Pacific Remote Islands)
Pacific Environment (Rose Atoll)
Pacific Environment (Marianas Trench)
Friends of the Earth (Marianas Trench)
The Action Network (Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument)
Pew Charitable Trusts (Pacific marine monuments)
NRDC (All 11 marine monuments/sanctuaries at issue)
NRDC (Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument)
Pew Charitable Trusts (Marine Monuments)
League of Conservation Voters 
EarthJustice

California League of Conservation Voters
Pacific Environment (California marine sanctuaries)


TWEETS TO SECRETARY ROSS AND SECRETARY ZINKE:

Keep our marine monuments protected and intact! These special places must be preserved! @SecretaryRoss pic.twitter.com/2h3oPXhbV4 💙🏝️🐬

.@SecretaryZinke I 💙 marine monuments! Keep them protected as they are today! 🏝️🐬🐡 #MonumentsForAll #oceans pic.twitter.com/YtUf9gOTM7





Thursday, July 13, 2017

CALL TO ACTION: Demand Senator Cardin Withdraw Sponsorship of SB1514


Sadly, environmental champion, Maryland's Senator Ben Cardin has joined a group of Senators to co-sponsor a bill that would strip wolf protections in the Great Lakes, circumvent the Endangered Species Act and prevent the EPA from ever addressing lead poisoning in fishing gear. In exchange for these decidedly anti-environmental, anti-Democratic positions, the bill would also reauthorize several conservation wetlands programs -  "a procedural action by Congress that has no real-work impact of funding levels." 

Per Center for Biological Diversity's Brett Harti: “This legislation won’t help conservation on the ground anywhere — not a single animal or plant will benefit from this horrible legislation. Sadly Cardin is trading killing thousands of wolves for a largely symbolic effort to help Chesapeake Bay. This is a disaster.”

HERE IS THE SCRIPT:  I am asking Sen. Cardin to rescind his sponsorship of the "HELP for Wildlife Act" (S. 1514). This bill is bad for our wildlife and would tarnish the Senator's environmental record. 

MARYLAND RESIDENTS:

Please call and email (COMMENT FORM HERE) Senator Cardin and demand that he rescind his co-sponsorship of SB1514. 

NON-MARYLAND AND MARYLAND RESIDENTS:

TWEET: .@SenatorCardin Pls withdraw sponsorship of #SB1514 - would kill wolves, poison rivers, undermine ESA! pic.twitter.com/ejcdJyi27V 💔🐺🐟

FACEBOOK: Leave a comment on Senator Cardin's page HERE.

SHARE this post to spread the word - especially with anyone you know in Maryland.

SIGN & SHARE PETITIONS:

Endangered Species Coalition
WildEarth Guardians
BornFree

INSTAGRAM: Re-Gram our posts @ecouprising2016

** Prepared in collaboration with EcoUprising, Save Wolves Now and Rising Storm.



Wednesday, July 12, 2017

TWEET SHEET: Stop Senate's Plan to Delist Wolves Permanently!



1) .@SenBennetCO Vote NO on bills that would permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review, or undermines ESA. pic.twitter.com/ccIcjRFVwg/

2) .@KamalaHarris NO on bills that cripple ESA or permanently delists wolves w/no judicial review! #Wolves pic.twitter.com/ccIcjRFVw

3) NO on all bills that cripple ESA or permanently delists wolves w/no judicial review! @SenFeinstein #Wolves pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

4) Vote NO on bills that undercut ESA, delist wolves permanently, preclude judicial review. @SenDurbin @SenDuckworth pic.twitter.com/bXwts5TmId

5) Wolves are NOT a bargaining chip! NO to any bill delisting them or undercutting ESA pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y @SenatorLeahy @sensanders

6) NO on bills to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. Undermines ESA! @SenBillNelson #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK

7) If @amyklobuchar is a Democrat why is she working with GOP to undermine the Endangered Species? #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/ccIcjRFVwg

8) Save the ESA! NO on bills to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. @SenGillibrand @SenSchumer pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRz

9) Vote NO on bills that undercut ESA, permanently delists wolves w/NO judicial review! @ChrisCoons @SenatorCarper pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

10) No bargain with wolves' lives! NO delisting, no precluding judicial review. @SenatorHassen @SenatorShaheen pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v

11) NO on bills that threaten ESA, delists wolves permanently, preclude judicial review @SenBlumenthal @ChrisMurphyCT pic.twitter.com/bXwts5TmId

12) Vote NO on bills that permanently delists wolves w/NO judicial review. Threatens ESA! @maziehirono @SenBrianSchatz pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

13) Wolves are big tourism draw! Important keystone predators. Pls #SaveTheESA and #KeepWolvesListed! @jontester pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK

14) @amyklobuchar sides with GOP to sell out ESA! Has bill to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. pic.twitter.com/ew7plGcWGj

15) Vote NO on bills that permanently delist wolves w/NO judicial review. Threaten ESA! @SenWarren #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

16) NO on bills that undercut ESA, delists wolves forever, prevent judicial review. @SenatorCardin @ChrisVanHollen pic.twitter.com/bXwts5TmId

17) Vote NO on bills that permanently delist wolves w/NO judicial review. Threaten ESA! @SenMarkey #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

18) NO on bills that permanently delist wolves w/NO judicial review. Threaten ESA! @maziehirono @SenBrianSchatz pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

19) Wolves are big tourism draw! Important keystone predators. Pls #SaveTheESA and #KeepWolvesListed! @jontester pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK

20) .@amyklobuchar sides with GOP to sell out ESA! Has bill to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. pic.twitter.com/ew7plGcWGj

21) Vote NO on bills that permanently delists wolves w/NO judicial review. Threatens ESA! @SenMarkey @SenWarren pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

22) NO to any bill that delists wolves, precludes judicial review. Threatens ESA! @Peters4Michigan @SenBobCasey pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

23) #SaveTheESA! NO to any bill that delists species, precludes judicial review. @SenSherrodBrown #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y/



24) NO on bills that threaten ESA by permanently delisting wolves, precluding judicial review. Dangerous! @SenGaryPeters pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v

25) Wolves are NOT a bargaining chip! NO to any bill delisting them or undercutting ESA. pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y @timkaine @MarkWarner

26) Dem senator is selling out the Endangered Species Act and partnering with GOP! Shame @SenatorBaldwin! pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v

27) NO on bills that threaten ESA by permanently delisting wolves, precluding judicial review. Dangerous! @SenStabenow pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v

28) @SenatorBaldwin joins GOP to undermine ESA! Her bill would delist wolves permanently, preclude judicial review! pic.twitter.com/KD96GMBQvD

29) Wolves are NOT a bargaining chip! NO to any bill delisting them or undercutting ESA pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y @SenJackReed @SenWhitehouse

30) NO to any bill that delists wolves, precludes judicial review. Threatens ESA! @CatherineForNV @stabenow pic.twitter.com/DEhm3m8W0AAhnCr

31) NO to any bill threatens ESA by permanently delisting wolves, precluding judicial review. @SenCortezMasto pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v

32) NO on bills that delist wolves permanently, enjoin judicial review, undercut ESA! @SenJeffMerkley @RonWyden pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y

33) Wolves= big tourism draw, important keystone predators. #SaveTheESA. @Sen_JoeManchin pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK

34) Protect the ESA! NO on bills which permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review @clairecmc #WarOnWolves pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRz


35) NO on bills that delist wolves permanently, enjoin judicial review, undercut ESA @martinheinrich @SenatorTomUdall pic.twitter.com/z5yD1Tie5Y

36) NO on bills that threaten ESA by permanently delisting wolves, precluding judicial review @SenatorHeitkamp @alfranken pic.twitter.com/ewcDUIsV6v

37) Save the ESA! NO on bills to permanently delist wolves, preclude judicial review. @SenDonnelly #KeepWolvesListed pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRz



38) Do NOT bargain with wolves' lives! NO delisting, no precluding judicial review @corybooker @SenatorMenendez pic.twitter.com/ccIcjRFVwg

39) NO to any bill that delists wolves, precludes judicial review or undercuts ESA! @SenatorCantwell @PattyMurray pic.twitter.com/1EXOL4paKz

40) Wolves= big tourism draw, important keystone predators. #SaveTheESA. @alfranken pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK

41) Wolves= big tourism draw. YOU sold out jobs sponsoring S164. @senjohnbarrasso pic.twitter.com/go5l9PVRzK

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

CALL TO ACTION: No ClearCuts in Our National Forests


Action needed. The House Natural Resources Committee recently approved the "Resilient Federal Forests Act (HR2936). This legislation sets arbitrary limits on the Endangered Species Act, overrides Cascade-Siskiyou's National Monument status, permits a huge number of logging projects to go forward without environmental review and much much more. We cannot let this happen to our national forests!

Please make sure that your representative knows that we value our forests, our national monuments and the Endangered Species Act. Please ask them to VOTE NO on HR2936.

EMAILS: Contact forms for your Congressmen and women HERE. Write, in your own words, why you want him or her to vote NO on HR2936 or copy and paste the following:

I urge you to VOTE NO ON HR2936 (The Resilient Federal Forests Act). This law would put our forests at risk to clearcutting, circumvents the Endangered Species Act, threatens biodiversity and watersheds, and threatens National Monuments by rescinding that designation for the Cascade-Siskiyou monument. I care about our national forests as an avid hiker, wildlife watcher and photographer. Please VOTE NO ON HR2936.

PHONE CALLS: Find your Representative's phone numbers HEREIt is best to call one of the local offices, rather than the DC office. Tell the staffer who answers that you expect a NO VOTE on HR2936, the Resilient Federal Forests Act.

RESISTBOT: Text 504-09 and type RESIST. The ResistBot will convert your texts to faxes to your Senators and representative. Please send a text to your Representative asking for a NO VOTE on HR2936 or copy and paste the following:

I urge you to VOTE NO ON HR2936 (The Resilient Federal Forests Act). This law would put our forests at risk to clearcutting, circumvents the Endangered Species Act, threatens biodiversity and watersheds, and threatens National Monuments by rescinding that designation for the Cascade-Siskiyou monument. I care about our national forests as an avid hiker, wildlife watcher and photographer. Please VOTE NO ON HR2936.

PETITIONS: EarthJustice 
                        Cascadia Wild

INSTAGRAM: Follow us on Instagram and re-gram our posts (@ecouprising2016)
TWITTER: Quote THIS TWEET (@ecouprising2016) and tag your Representative.